The 2012 movie came out on November 13. It was the number one movie in gross sales in its first week making $65 million. As a global disaster film of epic proportions, we wonder if the science fiction scenarios the movie depicts are purely fictional. Could it be that the science fiction is a portent of plausible future outcomes?
I found the movie to be engaging and highly entertaining. I saw it as a kind of video game. The lead character spends the whole movie dodging falling buildings, volcanic fireballs, and crumbling streets and runways.
I had no doubt he and his family would be there at the end along with, of course, the dog. So I see the movie as a kind of unwitting comedy.
The 2012 movie has the potential for negative cultural influence in two ways. In the first case, some people may take it as a credible foreshadowing of how 2012 will actually unfold.
Part of the promotion campaign for the movie was a website featuring a totally fictional Institute of Human Continuity where people could ostensibly sign up for a survival lottery. It’s clear the movie makers are trying to cash in on people’s fears of 2012.
In the second case, as a disinformation vehicle, the 2012 movie has the potential to reduce the whole 2012 phenomenon to ridicule. Then we are at risk of discounting the real challenges we face in the 2012 time.
In the interest of a grounded and realistic perspective on 2012, let’s look at some of the things the movie gets wrong. The movie makes some passing reference to the Mayan calendar which, as recorded on one monument, famously ends abruptly on December 21, 2012.
But there is no evidence at all that the Mayans predicted the world was going to end on December 21, 2012. The countdown to doomsday scenario is not in the Mayan record anywhere.
The Mayans just pointed their finger at the end of a great 25,800 year cycle. Starting with Jose Arguelles in his 1987 book, the Mayan Factor, it is modern humanity that has brought the issue of 2012 as a problematic time to prominence.
The dates for the earth change disasters are unclear in the movie. They ramp up starting in 2009 and it seems to all happen before the December 21, 2012 date.
The trigger is said to be the effect of neutrinos from the sun that somehow start behaving differently. Rather than passing through matter, the neutrinos engage with the earth core and heat up the core to the point where the crust becomes unstable.
The movie references the galactic alignment coming in 2012 where the plane of our solar system will intersect the center of the galaxy. This is supposed to somehow affect the sun which in turn affects the earth.
The neutrino idea is a movie gadget without even a hint of scientific plausibility. A basic change in elementary particle physics is not what we can expect from 2012.
It is true that scientists predict an increase in sun spot activity peaking in 2013. But this is just part of the normal cycle of solar activity. Sun spots have only a minor disruptive effect on our planet.
My clairvoyant reading is that we are not facing any sort of astronomically sourced catastrophic earth changes in the 2012 time. This reading falls in line with the best scientific information currently available.
Scientists tell us, and I clairvoyantly concur, that the sun’s output should be stable for at least another one billion years. My reading is we are not facing any major earth changes for the next 10,000 years.
And what’s happening in 10,000 years? My clairvoyant perspective is there will then be a change in magnetic polarity. But this pole reversal won’t have a devastating effect on the planet at that time.
The alignment with the galaxy center is a real astronomical event but seeing it as a countdown to doomsday makes no rational sense. This is an event which happens every 25,800 years as a result of the precession of the equinoxes. In the history of our planet, it has happened thousands of times before and the earth is still intact.
If there was some major planetary devastation happening on a regular 26,000 year cycle, it would certainly show up in the fossil record. There is simply no evidence at all this is true.
Is 2012 phenomenon then a kind of Y2K false alarm? In some ways 2012 repeats the millennial worst case scenarios where people thought the world would drastically change when 1999 became 2000.
In the case of both Y2K and 2012, some real event acts as an anchor for people’s projections. In Y2K it was the computer problem with the 2000 date and in 2012 it’s the galactic alignment.
In Y2K, the techies came in and fixed the computers. On January 1, 2000, it was business as usual. But 2012 is different. Here we are dealing with a phenomenon of far-reaching and substantial consequences.
We are indeed at a watershed in human history. Humanity has issues. We’re facing unprecedented challenges: global warming, planetary pollution, deforestation, species extinction, overpopulation in some countries, reduced birth rates and aging populations in others, pandemics that result from diseases jumping from animals to humans, natural resource exhaustion, economic turmoil.
The fate of humanity hangs in the balance. This fate will be decided by what we do in the next 20 years. Moreover, as a consequence of human actions, all life on the planet is in peril.
The apprehension of global disaster portrayed in the 2012 movie strikes a chord in us because we understand that, from one point of view, it would be divine justice if we were to suffer a massive die off of human beings.
We’re on the cusp of betraying the stewardship of the diversity of life on the planet, if we have not already done so. This stewardship comes from the fact that we are the one species that can manipulate the environment.
The good news is that the fate of humanity and the fate of life of earth are still, even at this late date, within our control. We don’t have to live in an ecologically adversarial relationship with the planet. We can move away from the disastrous perspective that all the resources of the planet are here to meet our human needs.
We have the capacity to respond to the growing ecological crisis on our planet. The response to the depletion of the ozone as a result of manmade chemicals is one positive example.
The perspective of seeing the 2012 time frame as a call to action gets lost in apocalyptic thinking and unfounded Chicken Little rumors like the return of a totally fictitious Planet X, Nibiru.
When in crisis, human beings unfortunately have a proclivity to seek distraction from the real issues by indulging in fiction and fantasy. 2012 as a countdown to doomsday is an egregious example.
The powerful emotions of fear and desire can keep us from seeing the future clearly. 2012 as doomsday feeds our fear. Equally pernicious is the desire to have 2012 mean something like rapture or ascension.
The spaceships are not going to come to take us to heaven. Nor will we experience such a kick start to our evolution that we no longer need physical bodies.
The distractions of doom or transcendence are comforting to us because, in both the worst and best case scenarios, there is no need to do anything. Our future is being determined by outside forces over which we have no control.
The real challenge we face in the 2012 time is to expand our consciousness and grow our spiritual intelligence. This impetus to a spiritual awakening of humankind does not come from a single source but from a convergence of sources. What’s sourcing 2012 will be a topic for another blog.
If we look at 2012 as a time frame that starts some years before 2012 and extends some years after, we can see a process underway to empower humanity to achieve the transformation needed for what will prove in the end to be a reinvention of civilization.
Humankind is not going to be allowed to fall through the cracks. Our billions of years of evolution are not taking us to a dead end in the 21st century.